(Reposted video, 3/4/25) ↓How a real, actual leader -- and human being -- speaks:


Temporarily left on autoplay (some viewers). YT video link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0L_UFqNKoGQ&ab_channel=BNNBloomberg

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓(Reposted 2/28/25, no affiliation:)


😱😱😱The ranting, unhinged orange clown on the right (video) -- spewing lies in support of Putin -- has the nuclear launch codes (..unless he turned those over to Musk, too..) 😱😱😱

More (off-site link:) "Tears and shock in Ukraine and Europe after heated Zelensky-Trump meeting"
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
famous-fonts

Unaffiliated 2/23/25 source article:https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20250223176/warren-buffett-warning-of-scoundrels-and-fiscal-folly-slashes-his-exposure-to-us-stocks
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
handwriting-fonts

2/9/25 article excerpt:

"..The second Trump administration’s brazen pattern of blowing through myriad apparent legal limits has prompted debate about its intentions. One theory is that it is deliberately setting up test cases that would ultimately pave the way for the Supreme Court’s Republican-appointed supermajority to expand presidential power by striking down the statutes as unconstitutional.

But the escalating pace of courtroom clashes has raised the question of what would happen if Mr. Trump simply started ignoring decisions he did not like, rather than appealing them. The result would be a constitutional crisis."


Unaffiliated source link: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/09/us/politics/vance-trump-federal-courts-executive-order.html

2/10/25 update: "Judge finds Trump administration violated court order halting funding freeze"(Off-site link:) https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/judge-finds-trump-administration-violated-court-order-halting-funding-rcna191528

(>>>>A couple of suggested links for taking some action. No direct affiliation here: https://democracyforward.org/, and, https://www.fiftyfifty.one/)

...Selected 2/2025 polling result: "Overwhelming majority of Americans say Trump should follow federal court rulings"
(Source link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/02/20/trump-poll-unpopular-post-ipsos/)

↑Public domain photo, edited. "Office of Speaker Mike Johnson, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons"

(↑Public domain image copy, edited)

(↑Public domain image copy, edited)
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************sherwood-font
↓↓↓Copy, no affiliation:

P.S. Re ongoing Trump lies..Crime is generally DOWN in the U.S.: : "New FBI statistics show continued drop in US crime in first six months of 2024"
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
(Trump inaugural partial quote:)
3d-fonts
graffiti-creator

Reposted 1/21/25 news story (link): "Trump grants sweeping pardon of Jan. 6 defendants, including rioters who violently attacked police"
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
3d-fonts
'“We won in a landslide,” Trump claims, again. In fact, he won the popular vote by just 1.5 percentage points, one of the smallest margins of victory since the 19th century."
Unaffiliated source link for ↑quotation: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/12/16/us/trump-news/65fa139e-2785-5caa-9e35-272e582b00b1?smid=url-share. Also: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-fact-checker-tracked-trump-claims/2021/01/23/ad04b69a-5c1d-11eb-a976-bad6431e03e2_story.html
P.S. 12/2024: ..The unhinged person that so many actually chose to vote for. (Link) ..Spewing out hate and screwball insults -- on Christmas no less -- isn't "normal", decent or sane. It's SICK in the head, most likely. (..Parental discretion suggested): https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/113716074695799383
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
↓↓↓↓ 11/2024.... NOPE:
art-deco-fonts

(Source: https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/thomas_jefferson_135369
Unaffiliated source for graffiti font: https://fontmeme.com/graffiti-creator/....REMINDER: How the 10 most highly educated U.S. states voted (overall) in 2024: https://donaldwontlast.blogspot.com/2024/11/headline-rubio-democrats-lost-election.html)
**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
graffiti-creator
"...a government run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens."

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Saturday, September 19, 2020

I obviously think I'm some kind of wonderful prognosticator, so here's an early, broad outline suggesting what's likely to happen related to the SCOTUS vacancy

 (Commentary, including reposted material. Temporarily posted.)

FWIW, I reserve the right to modify the outlined predictions, especially over the next few weeks:

(Sources reviewed for the following are linked:)

-- Donald Trump will likely nominate a woman. Here is a link to one current "short list". Part of the reason will be a cynical attempt to -- belatedly -- appeal to women voters.

-- Polling might help guide whether Republicans will nominate someone before Election Day, vs. shortly thereafter. (Caveat:) Reminder: Donald Trump likes to pick fightsdivide...and he rarely "does the right thing". Mitch McConnell is one of his chief enablers

...Trump has already indicated that he wants a nomination 'without delay'. One report suggests a nomination announcement before the first presidential debate.

-- Trump (and Republicans) will use the SCOTUS battle to distract from other issues, including probably worsening overall U.S. COVID-19 numbers this fall.

via GIPHY

-- Democrats will fight hard to delay a SCOTUS nomination until at least after election day, if not further. Large/energetic protests are likely to occur at some point. Can Democrats convince the public that it's wrong to nominate/confirm someone before the election, and/or before (its) results are in? (Also ref. 'polling', above.) Conversely, Republicans (overall) may be willing to "go to the mat" over this nomination (i.e., almost "no matter what.."), as it seems to be a rare opportunity to shape the court for years.

-- (To Republicans' delight..) 'Obamacare' may be in peril. (Ref. link.)

-- Subject to revision in the weeks ahead, as things generally look right now, Donald Trump will lose the presidential election -- both by popular vote and in the electoral college. Complete voting results however, will not likely be available on or around November 3rd, leading to disputes and at least some delaying (..and dividing) tactics. Also: As things look right now the most likely election vote outcome for the U.S. Senate may be a 50-50 split

-- If you 'buy' the last prediction above, Democrats (in general) will subsequently fight with everything they can muster to delay the SCOTUS appointment until after the 2021 presidential inauguration. 

-- Ultimately, Democrats may be unable to prevent a SCOTUS nomination from Trump/Republicans prior to the 2021 inauguration. If they gain power, Dems. may (then) consider "structural changes", including expanding (or 'packing') the Supreme Court, ending the filibuster, etc.


....We will see how this develops...



via GIPHY


No comments:

Post a Comment